YES 0.761
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Int] -> Int) :: [Int] -> Int) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Int] -> Int) :: [Int] -> Int) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
mainModule Main
| ((product :: [Int] -> Int) :: [Int] -> Int) |
module Main where
Num Reduction: All numbers are transformed to thier corresponding representation with Pos, Neg, Succ and Zero.
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (product :: [Int] -> Int) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primPlusNat(Succ(vx800), Succ(vx30000)) → new_primPlusNat(vx800, vx30000)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primPlusNat(Succ(vx800), Succ(vx30000)) → new_primPlusNat(vx800, vx30000)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat(Succ(vx400), Succ(vx3000)) → new_primMulNat(vx400, Succ(vx3000))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMulNat(Succ(vx400), Succ(vx3000)) → new_primMulNat(vx400, Succ(vx3000))
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx40), Pos(vx300), vx5, vx31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vx40, vx300, vx31)
new_enforceWHNF(vx40, vx300, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx310, Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx311)
new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(vx40), Pos(vx300), vx5, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx310, Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx311)
new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(vx40), Neg(vx300), vx5, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_seq(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx310, new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx311)
new_enforceWHNF1(vx40, vx300, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_seq(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx310, new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx311)
new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx40), Neg(vx300), vx5, vx31) → new_enforceWHNF(vx40, vx300, vx31)
new_seq(vx6, vx310, vx7, vx311) → new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx6), vx310, Neg(vx7), vx311)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMulNat0(Succ(vx400), Zero) → Zero
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Succ(vx3000)) → Zero
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, vx3000) → Succ(vx3000)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vx80), vx3000) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat1(vx80, vx3000)))
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vx800), Zero) → Succ(vx800)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Succ(vx30000)) → Succ(vx30000)
new_primMulNat0(Succ(vx400), Succ(vx3000)) → new_primPlusNat0(new_primMulNat0(vx400, Succ(vx3000)), vx3000)
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vx800), Succ(vx30000)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat1(vx800, vx30000)))
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Zero) → Zero
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(x0), x1)
new_primMulNat0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primPlusNat1(Zero, Zero)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, x0)
new_primMulNat0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMulNat0(Zero, Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_enforceWHNF1(vx40, vx300, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_seq(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx310, new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx311)
The graph contains the following edges 3 > 2, 3 > 4
- new_seq(vx6, vx310, vx7, vx311) → new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx6), vx310, Neg(vx7), vx311)
The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 2, 4 >= 4
- new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(vx40), Pos(vx300), vx5, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx310, Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx311)
The graph contains the following edges 4 > 2, 4 > 4
- new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(vx40), Neg(vx300), vx5, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_seq(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx310, new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300), vx311)
The graph contains the following edges 4 > 2, 4 > 4
- new_enforceWHNF(vx40, vx300, :(vx310, vx311)) → new_enforceWHNF0(Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx310, Pos(new_primMulNat0(vx40, vx300)), vx311)
The graph contains the following edges 3 > 2, 3 > 4
- new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx40), Neg(vx300), vx5, vx31) → new_enforceWHNF(vx40, vx300, vx31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 3
- new_enforceWHNF0(Neg(vx40), Pos(vx300), vx5, vx31) → new_enforceWHNF1(vx40, vx300, vx31)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 4 >= 3